In recent days there have been umpteen discussions about the United Nations. This time it is about the U.N. Iraqi oil-for-food program; the Secretary-General Kofi A. Annan’s son, Kojo, was recently reported of having received $2,000 per month from that program.
The discussions have also been about whether the U.N. still has its cold war clout and charm. And the answer is no, but here are a few steps I feel will help the U.N. regain its lost glory:
* First, Annan needs to go - either by resignation or by firing. Just too many errors have been made by him and his cronies during the past year.
* Second, the Security Council is the foundation of the U.N. It is composed of permanent members, with veto power, and pro tem-members. (The veto is a very imperative power, as one permanent member can overrule a resolution single-handedly.) France, with just over 60 million people, has that power, but India, with 1 billion people, is left voiceless.
* And finally, the U.N. needs to rally its members to change the Geneva and the other “war” accords. We do not live in the 1940s. We live in a day and age of terrorism, where many of those rules do not apply. A terrorist is not a soldier, and that needs to be made clearer.
For the United States’ part: We need to remind the U.N. that America’s contributions amount to over 22 percent its total budget; that itself should be sufficient.
EDITORS’ NOTE: We are just a weekly publication, and will be soon moving to our new domain name. But becasue the tsunamis we were updating our news and editorials at a faster pace.